La  radiografía cefálica: más allá de una medida cefalométrica

Ana María Quintero; Bibiana Escobar; Natalia Vélez Trujillo

doi:10.16925/od.v0i0.330

The cephalic radiograph : beyond a cephalometric measure

Research Articles

https://doi.org/10.16925/od.v0i0.330

Ana María Quintero Ver Biografía

Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia

Bibiana Escobar Ver Biografía

Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia

Natalia Vélez Trujillo Ver Biografía

Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia.

Orthodontic practice recognizes the importance of the cephalic lateral radiograph, although it is actually limited to quan- titative analysis. A literature review was made to assess the morphological characteristics that, at first glance, can be evaluated in the radiography and constitute tools for predicting risk factors, prognosis, and stability. The conclusion is that the cephalic lateral radio- graph gives a broader view of craniofacial growth patterns, which can be modified by various structures such as skull base, cranio- cervical posture, airways, and position of the hyoid bone; this without losing sight of the cervical vertebrae and the morphology of the mandibular symphysis, which are important diagnostic factors when making clinical decisions. Cephalic lateral radiography therefore provides important qualitative information that cannot be ignored and which enables accurate diagnosis.

Keywords: skull base, hyoid bone, cranio-cervical posture, cephalic radiography, mandibular symphysis, cervical vertebrae, airways.

Solow B, Siersbaek-Nielsen S. Cervical and craniocervical posture as predictors of craniofacial growth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992; 101(5): 449-58.

Wilhelm BM, Beck FM, Lidral AC, Vig KW. A comparison of cranial base growth in Class I and Class II skeletal patterns. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001; 119(4): 401-5.

Henneberke M, Prahl-Andersen B. Cranial base growth for Dutch boys and girls: a multilevel approach. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994; 106(5): 503-12.

Dhopatkar A, Bhatia S, Rock P. An investigation into the relationship between the cranial base angle and malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2002; 72(5): 456-63.

Hopkin GB, Houston W, James GA. The cranial base as an aetiological factor in malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 1968; 38(3): 250-5.

Ford MD. Growth of the human cranial base. Am J Orthodontics. 1958; 7(44): 498-506.

Malta LA, Ortolani CF, Faltin K. Quantification of cranial base growth during pubertal growth. J Orthod. 2009;

(4): 229-35.

Lei WY, Wong RW, Rabie AB. Factors regulating endochondral ossification in the spheno-occipital synchondrosis. Angle Orthod. 2008; 78(2): 215-20.

Björk A. Cranial base development. The Eleventh International Dental Congress Scientific Section. London July 19 to 26 1952.

Latham RA. The sella point and postnatal growth of the human cranial base. Am J Orthod. 1972; 61(2): 156-62.

Ruiz AJ, Canseco J, Cuairán V. Relationship between cranial base flexure and skeletal class. Rev Odont Mex. 2011;.15(4): 214-8.

Andria LM, Leite LP, Prevatte TM, King LB. Correlation of the cranial base angle and its components with other dental/skeletal variables and treatment time. Angle Orthod. 2004; 74(3): 361-6.

Proff P, Will F, Bokan I, Fanghanel J, Gedrange T. Cranial base features in skeletal Class III patients. Angle Orthod. 2008; 78(3): 433-9.

Klocke A, Nanda RS, Kahl-Nieke B. Role of cranial base flexure in developing sagittal jaw discrepancies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002; 122(4): 386-91.

Anderson D, Popovich F. Correlations among craniofacial angles and dimensions in Class I and Class II malocclusions. Angle Orthod. 1989;.59(1):.37-42.

Pachi F, Turla R, Checchi AP. Head posture and lower arch dental crowding. Angle Orthod. 2009; 79(5): 873-9.

Garcia de Paula e Silva FW, Mussolino de Queiroz A, Díaz KV . Posture alterations and consequence to stomatognatic system. Acta Odontol Venez. 2008; 46(4): 1-7.

Solow B, Sandham A. Cranio-cervical posture: a factor in the development and function of the dentofacial

structures. Eur J Orthod. 2002; 24(5): 447-56.

Solow B, Siersbaek-Nielsen S. Growth changes in head posture related to craniofacial development. Am J Orthod. 1986; 89(2): 132-40.

Cuccia AM, Lotti M, Caradonna D. Oral breathing and head posture. Angle Orthod. 2008; 78(1): 77-82.

Huggare J. Association between morphology of the first cervical vertebra, head posture, and craniofacial structures. Eur J Orthod. 1991; 13: 435-40.

Baydas B, Yavuz I, Durna N, Ceylan I. An investigation of cervicovertebral morphology in different sagittal skeletal growth patterns. Eur J Orthod. 2004; 26(1): 43-9.

Gu Y, McNamara JA. Mandibular growth changes and cervical vertebral maturation. A cephalometric implant study. Angle Orthod. 2007; 77(6): 947-53.

Franchi L, Baccetti T, Mcnamara J. Mandibular growth as related to cervical vertebral maturation and body heigth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000; 118: 335-40.

Baccetti T, Franchi L, Mcnamara J. The cervical vertebral maturation (cvm) method for the assessment of

optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Semin orthod. 2005; 11: 119-29.

Baccetti T, Franchi L, Mcnamara J. An improved version of the cervical vertebral maturation (cvm) method for the assessment of mandibular growth. Angle Orthod. 2002; 72: 316-23.

Gandini P, Mancini M, Andreani F. A comparison of hand-wrist bone and cervical vertebral analyses in

measuring skeletal maturation. Angle Orthod. 2006; 76(6): 984-9.

Lamparski D. Skeletal age assessment utilizing cervical vertebrae. [thesis]. Pittsburg: University of Pittsburg; 1972.

Fudalej P, Bollen AM. Effectiveness of the cervical vertebral maturation method to predict postpeak circumpubertal growth of craniofacial structures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 137(1): 59-65.

Soegiharto BM, Moles DR, Cunningham SJ. Discriminatory ability of the skeletal maturation index and the cervical vertebrae maturation index in detecting peak pubertal growth in Indonesian and white subjects with

receiver operating characteristics analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 134(2): 227-37.

Zhao XG, Lin J, Jiang JH, Wang Q, Hong S. Validity and reliability of a method for assessment of cervical vertebral maturation. Angle Orthod. 2012; 82(2): 229-34.

Carulla D, Espinosa D, Mesa T. Estudio cefalométrico del hueso hioides en niños respiradores bucales de 11 años (I parte). Rev Cubana Estomatol. 2008; 45(2): versión On-line.

Sheng CM, Lin LH, Su Y, Tsai HH. Developmental Changes in Pharyngeal Airway Depth and Hyoid Bone Position from Childhood to Young Adulthood. Angle Orthod. 2009; 79: 484-90.

Adamidis IP, Spyropoulos MN. Hyoid bone position and orientation in class I and class III malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992; 101: 308-12.

Pae EK, Quas C, Quas J, Garrett N. Can facial type be used to predict changes in hyoid bone position with age? A perspective based on longitudinal data. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 134: 792-7.

Jena AK, Duggal R. Hyoid bone position in subjects with different vertical jaw dysplasias. Angle Orthod. 2011; 81(1): 81-5.

Yamaoka M, Furusawa K, Uematsu T, Okafuji N, Kayamoto D, Kurihara S. Relationship of the hyoid bone and posterior surface of the tongue in prognathism and micrognathia. J Oral Rehabil. 2003; 30(9): 914-20.

Kollias I, Krogstad O. Adult craniocervical and pharyngeal changes. A longitudinal cephalometric study between 22 and 42 years of age. Part II: Morphological uvulo-glossopharyngeal changes. Eur J Orthod. 1999;

(4): 345-55.

Phoenix A, Valiathan M, Nelson S, Strohl KP, Hans M. Changes in hyoid bone position following rapid maxillary expansion in adolescents. Angle Orthod. 2011; 81(4): 632-8.

Lin YC LH, Tsai HH. Changes in the Pharyngeal Airway and Position of the Hyoid Bone After Treatment with a Modified Bionator in Growing Patients With Retrognathia. J Exp Clin Med. 2011; 3(2): 93-8.

Graber LW. Hyoid changes following orthopedic treatment of mandibular prognathism. Angle Orthod. 1978; 48(1): 33-8.

Goncalves R de C, Raveli DB, Pinto Ados S. Effects of age and gender on upper airway, lower airway and upper lip growth. Braz Oral Res. 2011; 25(3): 241-7.

Martin O, Muelas L, Vinas MJ. Nasopharyngeal cephalometric study of ideal occlusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 130(4): 436 e1-9.

Solow B, Skov S, Ovesen J, Norup PW, Wildschiodtz G. Airway dimensions and head posture in bstructive sleep apnoea. Eur J Orthod. 1996; 18(6): 571-9.

Gungor AY, Turkkahraman H. Effects of airway problems on maxillary growth: a review. Eur J Dent. 2009; 3(3): 250-4.

Ingman T, Nieminen T, Hurmerinta K. Cephalometric comparison of pharyngeal changes in subjects with upper airway resistance syndrome or obstructive sleep apnoea in upright and supine positions. Eur J Orthod. 2004; 26(3): 321-6.

Behlfelt K, Linder-Aronson S, McWilliam J, Neander P, Laage-Hellman J. Dentition in children with enlarged

tonsils compared to control children. Eur J Orthod. 1989; 11(4): 416-29.

Aki T, Nanda RS, Currier GF, Nanda SK. Assessment of symphysis morphology as a predictor of the direction of mandibular growth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994; 106(1): 60-9.

Mangla R, Singh N, Dua V, Padmanabhan P, Khanna M. Evaluation of mandibular morphology in different facial types. Contemp Clin Dent. 2011; 2(3): 200-6.

Gracco A, Luca L, Bongiorno MC, Siciliani G. Computed tomography evaluation of mandibular incisor bony support in untreated patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 138(2): 179-87.

The cephalic radiograph: beyond a cephalometric measure. (2014). Revista Nacional De Odontología. https://doi.org/10.16925/od.v0i0.330

Download Citation

Every single author of the articles has to declare that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by them, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in the contract.

In this sense, the authors committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal Revista Nacional de Odontologia before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, the authors committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.

At the same time, the authors have to declare that they are completely in agreement with the conditions presented in their work and that they cede all patrimonial rights. These rights involve reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.

The cephalic radiograph : beyond a cephalometric measure

Most read articles by the same author(s)