Revisión de Tema

Análise estética do paciente fatores a considerar na harmonização orofacial

v. 16 n. 2 (2020)
Publicado: 2020-12-07
Jefferson David Melo de Matos
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) image/svg+xml
André Guimarães Rodrigues
Universidade de Vila Velha UVV
Alessandra Dossi Pinto
Faculdade São Francisco de Assis ESFA
Pedro Jacy Santos Diamantino
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) image/svg+xml
Marco Antonio Bottino
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) image/svg+xml
Guilherme da Rocha Scalzer Lopes
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) image/svg+xml
Daniel Sartorelli Marques de Castro
Centro Universitário Cristus UNICHRISTUS
Valdir Cabral Andrade
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora UFJF

A análise facial e odontológica deve estar integrada a todos os tratamentos dentários, onde a estética e a função devem ser os objetivos principais, uma vez que a face é a base principal do equilíbrio estético, e a odon-tologia deve estar em sintonia com ela. O objetivo deste trabalho é uma revisão da literatura para identificar os fatores que devem ser considerados na análise estética do paciente quando submetido a um tratamento odontológico. A percepção de um rosto equilibrado é possível, havendo um conceito diversificado de beleza facial, e isso varia de acordo com o paciente, o tratamento estético deve ser sempre uma função aliada, para que se possa melhorar a harmonia facial com o sorriso, retribuir o estética positiva significa atender às expec-tativas e dar uma autoimagem positiva. Conclui-se que a percepção de um rosto equilibrado é possível, existe um conceito diversificado de beleza facial, e isso varia de acordo com o paciente.

Palavras-chave: estética, estética odontológica, sorridente

Como Citar

Análise estética do paciente: fatores a considerar na harmonização orofacial. (2020). Revista Nacional de Odontología, 16(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.16925/2357-4607.2020.02.09

Koidou VP, Chatzopoulos GS, Rosenstiel SF. Quantification of facial and smile esthetics. J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Feb;119(2): 270-277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.04.002

Parciak EC, Dahiya AT, AlRumaih HS, Kattadiyil MT, Baba NZ, Goodacre CJ. Comparison of maxillary anterior tooth width and facial dimensions of 3 ethnicities. J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Oct;118(4): 504-510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.10.035

Koidou VP, Rosenstiel SF, Rashid RG. Celebrity smile esthetics assessment: Smile angulation. J Prosthet Dent. 2017 May;117(5): 636-641. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.008

Silva BP, Jiménez-Castellanos E, Finkel S, Macias IR, Chu SJ. Layperson’s preference regarding orientation of the transverse occlusal plane and commissure line from the frontal perspec-tive. J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Apr;117(4): 513-516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.07.027

Sumita YI, Hattori M, Elbashti ME, Taniguchi H. Orientation of handle for successful prosthetic treatment in patients with an anatomic compromise after a maxillectomy. J Prosthet Dent. 2017 May;117(5): 694-696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.028

Pascali M, Avantaggiato A, Carinci F. Tarsal Strip Versus Tarsal Belt in Ectropion Correction: A Statistical Evaluation. J Craniofac Surg. 2017 Mar;28(2): e186-e189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003137

Mazzoleni F, Meazzini MC, Novelli G, Basile V, Giussani C, Bozzetti A. Photometric evaluation of cranial and facial symmetry in hemicoronal single suture synostosis treated with surgical fronto-orbital remodeling. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016 Aug;44(8): 1037-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2016.05.012

SantosIKS, MatosJDM, Barros JD, Medeiros CR, Cariri TFA, VasconcelosBCG,et al. Bichecto-my as an alternative treatment for facial harmonization - Case Report. Int J Inf Res Rev. 2017; 05(11): 1495-1502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/5926

Kim SY, Bayome M, Park JH, Kook YA, Kang JH, Kim KH, et al.. Evaluation of the facial di-mensions of young adult women with a preferred facial appearance. Korean J Orthod. 2015 Sep;45(5): 253-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2015.45.5.253

Kwak KH, Kim YI, Nam HJ, Kim SS, Park SB, Son WS. Differences Among Deviations, Genders, and Observers in the Perception of Eye and Nose Asymmetry. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Aug;73(8): 1606-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2015.02.009

Kokich VO Jr. Commentary. Concurrence between interpupillary line and tangent to the in-cisal edge of the upper central incisor teeth. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2009;21(5): 323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2009.00284.x

Bhikoo C, Xu J, Sun H, Jin C, Jiang H, Hu R. Factors affecting treatment duration of labial inversely impacted maxillary central incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 May;153 (5): 708-715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.09.017

Meinhardt G, Kurbel D, Meinhardt-Injac B, Persike M. External and internal facial features modulate processing of vertical but not horizontal spatial relations. Vision Res. 2018 Mar 22. pii: S0042-6989(18)30038-5.

Gilad-Gutnick S, Harmatz ES, Tsourides K, Yovel G, Sinha P. Recognizing Facial Slivers. J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Jul;30(7): 951-962. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01265

Goffaux V. The horizontal and vertical relations in upright faces are transmitted by different spatial frequency ranges. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 May;128(1): 119-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.11.005

Goffaux V, Rossion B, Sorger B, Schiltz C, Goebel R. Face inversion disrupts the percep-tion of vertical relations between features in the right human occipito-temporal cortex. J Neuropsychol. 2009 Mar;3(Pt 1): 45-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/174866408X292670

Goffaux V, Rossion B. Face inversion disproportionately impairs the perception of vertical but not horizontal relations between features. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Aug;33(4): 995-1002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.995

Goffaux V, van Zon J, Schiltz C. The horizontal tuning of face perception relies on the process-ing of intermediate and high spatial frequencies. J Vis. 2011 Sep 7;11(10). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1167/11.10.1

Lim WH, Park EW, Chae HS, Kwon SM, Jung HI, Baek SH. Alveolar Molding Effect in Infants with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: Comparison of Two- and Three-Dimensional Measurements. J Craniofac Surg. 2017 Jun;28(4): e333-e337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003578

Bynum J. Treatment of a “Gummy Smile”: Understanding Etiology is Key to Success. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2016 Feb;37(2): 114-22.

Pavone AF, Ghassemian M, Verardi S. Gummy Smile and Short Tooth Syndrome--Part 1: Etiopathogenesis, Classification, and Diagnostic Guidelines. Compend Contin Educ Dent.2016 Feb;37(2): 102-7.

Arias DM, Trushkowsky RD, Brea LM, David SB. Treatment of the Patient with Gummy Smile in Conjunction with Digital Smile Approach. Dent Clin North Am. 2015 Jul;59(3): 703-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2015.03.007

Monaco A, Streni O, Marci MC, Marzo G, Gatto R, Giannoni M. Gummy smile: clinical para-meters useful for diagnosis and therapeutical approach. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2004 Fall;29(1): 19-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.29.1.y01l3r4m06q3k2x0

Trushkowsky R, Arias DM, David S. Digital Smile Design concept delineates the final potential result of crown lengthening and porcelain veneers to correct a gummy smile. Int J Esthet Dent. Autumn 2016;11(3): 338-54.

Dolt AH 3rd, Robbins JW. Altered passive eruption: an etiology of short clinical crowns. Quintessence Int. 1997 Jun;28(6): 363-72.

Mancini L, Gibson TL, Grayson BH, Flores RL, Staffenberg D, Shetye PR. Three-Dimensional Soft Tissue Nasal Changes After Nasoalveolar Molding and Primary Cheilorhinoplasty in Infants With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018 Jan 1: 1055665618771427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665618771427

Miyazaki H, Makiguchi T, Takayama Y, Yokoo S. Lower lip repair using double opposing rectan-gular rotation flaps with reconstruction of the mentolabial groove and mental protuberance. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Sep;43(9): 1073-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2014.06.001

Leemans M, van Alphen MJA, van den Brekel MWM, Hekman EEG. Analysis of tracheostoma morphology. Acta Otolaryngol. 2017 Sep;137(9): 997-1001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2017.1306880

Naik R, Ahmed Mujib BR, Telagi N, Hallur J. Comparative analysis of lip with thumbprints: An identification tool in personal authentication. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2017 Jan-Apr;21(1): 171-175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_189_14

Parekh SM, Fields HW, Beck M, Rosenstiel S. Attractiveness of variations in the smile arc and buccal corridor space as judged by orthodontists and laymen. Angle Orthod. 2006 Jul;76(4): 557-63.

Coll JA, Seale NS, Vargas K, Marghalani AA, Al Shamali S, Graham L. Primary Tooth Vital Pulp Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Pediatr Dent. 2017 Jan 15;39(1): 16-123.

La Corte E, Aldana PR. Endoscopic approach to the upper cervical spine and clivus: an anatomical study of the upper limits of the transoral corridor. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017 Apr;159(4): 633-639. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3103-6

Moura RL, Amado-Filho GM, Moraes FC, Brasileiro PS, Salomon PS, Mahiques MM, et al. An extensive reef system at the Amazon River mouth. Sci Adv. 2016 Apr 22;2(4): e1501252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1501252

Wang C, Hu WJ, Liang LZ, Zhang YL, Chung KH. Esthetics and smile-related characteristics assessed by laypersons. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018 Mar;30(2): 136-145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12356

Kolte AP, Kolte RA, Agrawal AA, Shrirao T, Mankar K. Association between central papilla reces-sion and gingival and interdental smile line. Quintessence Int. 2017 Nov 30: 25-32.

Zhou Y, Liu M, Zhang T, Zheng H, Sun Y, Yang X, et al. In vivo confocal laser microscopy of morphologic changes after small incision lenticule extraction with accelerated cross-linking (SMILE Xtra) in patients with thin corneas and high myopia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Jan;256(1): 199-207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-017-3811-x

Zarone F, Leone R, Ferrari M, Sorrentino R. Treatment Concept for a Patient with a High Smile Line and Gingival Pigmentation: A Case Report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2017 Mar/Apr;37(2): e142-e148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.2833

Cohen JL, Swift A, Solish N, Fagien S, Glaser DA. OnabotulinumtoxinA and Hyaluronic Acid in Facial Wrinkles and Folds: A Prospective, Open-Label Comparison. Aesthet Surg J. 2018 May 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjy116

Frampton JE, Easthope SE. Botulinum toxin A (Botox Cosmetic): a review of its use in the treatment of glabellar frown lines. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2003;4(10): 709-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00128071-200304100-00005

Castelli A, Le Gall M, Monnet-Corti V. [Behavior of the periodontium during leveling of the mandibular incisors: what precautions are needed?]. Orthod Fr. 2016 Mar;87(1): 99-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/orthodfr/2016006

Reddy VB, Kumar TA, Prasad M, Nuvvula S, Patil RG, Reddy PK. A comparative in-vivo evalua-tion of the alignment efficiency of 5 ligation methods: A prospective randomized clinical trial. Eur J Dent. 2014 Jan;8(1): 23-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.126236

Talapaneni AK, Supraja G, Prasad M, Kommi PB. Comparison of sagittal and vertical dental changes during first phase of orthodontic treatment with MBT vs ROTH prescription. Indian J Dent Res. 2012 Mar-Apr;23(2): 182-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.100423

Ko EW, Huang CS, Chen YR. Characteristics and corrective outcome of face asymmetry by orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Oct;67(10): 2201-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.039

Danguy M, Danguy-Derot C. [Treatment of overbite and leveling]. Orthod Fr. 2003 Dec;74(4): 511-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/orthodfr/200374511

Woods MG. Mandibular arch dimensional and positional changes in late mixed-dentition Class I and II treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002 Aug;122(2): 180-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2002.125575

Braun S, Hnat WP, Johnson BE. The curve of Spee revisited. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996 Aug;110(2): 206-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70110-5

MÉTRICAS
VISUALIZAÇÕES DO ARTIGO: 1614
VISUALIZAÇÕES DO PDF: 1503

Artigos mais lidos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)