O direito como regulador do discurso ideológico da fraternidade em uma sociedade pós-liberal

Adilson Silva Ferraz

doi:10.16925/di.v17i21.977

The Law as Regulator of the Ideological Discourse of Fraternity in a Post-Liberal Society

Derechos Humanos

https://doi.org/10.16925/di.v17i21.977

Adilson Silva Ferraz Ver Biografía

Faculdade ASCES, Pernambuco.

Ths text aims to show that there is a gap between fraternity in its utopian (ideal) sense and its practical (real) sense. Th utopian sense is customarily used as the basis for the practical sense and can discursively be manipulated for any practical purpose, even against human rights. We call this the “ideological discourse of fraternity”. We explain that fraternity exists dialectically and is defied rhetorically like other phenomena. Th dialectic explains fraternity based on the idea of “fraternal openness”, and a special phenomenon that acts in the mutual recognition between individuals and in the resignifiation of otherness. We then present the
main thesis: the inclusion of fraternity as a legal element that can help to prevent the ideological discourse of law itself (when this is turned against fundamental rights) and serve as a barrier of containment for the ideological discourse of moral fraternity, even though there is always the risk that this may be used to deepen the gap between utopia and practice, by becoming a legal mechanism for social oppression

Keywords: law, fraternity, ideology, moral, utopia

Antônio Maria Baggio (org.). O Princípio Esquecido: exi-gências, recursos e definições da fraternidade na política. Cidade Nova. (2008).

Bertrand Russell. Ensaios céticos. l & pm. (2014).

Chiara Lubich. Essential writings. Spirituality. Dialogue. Culture. New City Press. (2007).

Emir Sader. Refundar el Estado. Posneoliberalismo en América Latina. Instituto de Estudios y Formación de la cta. (2008).

Enrique Del Percio. Ineludible Fraternidad – conflicto, poder y deseo. Ciccus. (2014).

Ernst Tugendhat. Introducción a la filosofía analítica. Gedisa. (2003).

Jamie Peck. Nik Theodore e Neil Brenner. Mal-estar no Pós-neoliberalismo. Novos Estudos – cebrap 92. Marzo de 2012.

Jean-Luc Ferry. A revolução do amor: por uma espiritualidade laica. Trad. Véra Lucia dos Reis. Objetiva. (2012).

João Maurício Adeodato. A Retórica Constitucional – sobre tolerância, direitos humanos e outros fundamentos éticos do direito positivo. Saraiva. (2009).

Marcel David. Fraternité et Revolution Française – 1789-1799. Aubier. (1987).

Marconi Andrade Silva, Fernando Gomes Andrade e Paulo Muniz Lopes (Orgs.). Cidadania, participação e fra-ternidade – uma abordagem multidisciplinar. Editora ufpe. (2014).

Maria Voce. Desafios. Cidade Nova. (2014).

Mehmet Serkan Gümüş. Islam et Christianisme. Hakîkat Kitâbevi. (2010).

Mônica Nicknich. A fraternidade como valor orientativo dos novos direitos na posmodernidade. Antônio Maria Baggio (Org.). O princípio esquecido: exigências, recursos e definições da fraternidade na polí-tica. Cidade Nova. (2008).

Osvaldo Barreneche (Org.). Estudios Recientes sobre Fraternidad – de la enunciación como principio a la consolidación como perspectiva. Ciudad Nueva. (2010)

Teun Van Djik. Discurso e poder. Contexto. (2008).Thomas Piketty. O capital no século xxi. Intrínseca. (2014).

Silva Ferraz, A. (2015). The Law as Regulator of the Ideological Discourse of Fraternity in a Post-Liberal Society. DIXI, 17(21). https://doi.org/10.16925/di.v17i21.977

Download Citation

Every single author of the articles has to declare that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by them, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in the contract.

In this sense, the authors committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal DIXI before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, the authors committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.

At the same time, the authors have to declare that they are completely in agreement with the conditions presented in their work and that they cede all patrimonial rights. These rights involve reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 21 (2015)

Published

2015-06-01

Downloads

PDF (Portuguese)

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

https://plu.mx/plum/a/?doi=10.16925/di.v17i21.977