Artículo de investigación

Mecanismos de controle estatal como meio de melhorar a qualidade dos serviços públicos dos governos locais

v. 26 n. 2 (2024)
Publicado: 2024-06-19
Vitalii Kruhlov
Nataliia Volkova
Yevgen Krasnykov
Iryna Alieksieienko
Larysa Sokhatiuk

O artigo trata dos mecanismos de controle estatal e seu papel na melhoria da qualidade dos serviços públicos prestados pelos órgãos de governo autônomo locais. O objetivo do artigo é identificar os principais mecanismos de controle estatal, oportunidades para melhorar o nível de serviços públicos dos órgãos de governo autônomo locais e fornecer recomendações para melhorar o sistema de controle estatal. Foram estudados diferentes mecanismos de controle estatal, incluindo inspeções, avaliação de desempenho, auditoria financeira, padrões de qualidade, supervisão legal e mecanismos de feedback dos cidadãos. Análise contextual, comparação e métodos gráficos foram utilizados como métodos de pesquisa. A satisfação com os serviços nos países da UE foi determinada por diferentes áreas dos serviços públicos. O estudo enfatiza a importância do controlo estatal na promoção da transparência, responsabilização e melhoria contínua na prestação de serviços do governo local. Os resultados do estudo demonstram formas de optimização dos mecanismos de controlo estatal pelas autoridades públicas para melhorar a qualidade global dos serviços públicos. A atenção está centrada na necessidade de um controlo estatal eficaz para aumentar o nível de satisfação e bem-estar dos cidadãos a nível local. Foi desenvolvido um modelo de implementação abrangente de mecanismos de controle estatal sobre a qualidade dos serviços públicos dos órgãos de governo autônomo locais.

Palavras-chave: Array, Array, Array, Array, Array, Array

Como Citar

Kruhlov, V., Volkova, N., Krasnykov, Y., Alieksieienko, I., & Sokhatiuk, L. (2024). Mecanismos de controle estatal como meio de melhorar a qualidade dos serviços públicos dos governos locais. DIXI, 26(2), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.16925/2357-5891.2024.02.01

Bawan Yassin Sabir, Baban Jabbar Othman, Bayar Gardi, Nechirwan Burhan Ismael, Pshdar Abdalla Hamza, Sarhang Sorguli, Hassan Mahmood Aziz, Shahla Ali Ahmed, Bayad Jamal Ali & Govand Anwar. Administrative Decentralization: The Transfer of Competency from the Ministry of Education to General Directorates. International Journal of Rural Development, Environment and Health Research, vol. 5, no. 3. June 2021. Available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijreh.5.3.1

Boštjan Brezovnik, Istvan Hoffman & Jarosław Kostrubiec. Local Self-Government in Europe. Lex Localis [online]. 2021. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4335/978-961-7124-00-2

Bawan Yassin Sabir, Baban Jabbar Othman, Bayar Gardi, Nechirwan Burhan Ismael, Pshdar Abdalla Hamza, Sarhang Sorguli, Hassan Mahmood Aziz, Shahla Ali Ahmed, Bayad Jamal Ali & Govand Anwar. Administrative Decentralization: The Transfer of Competency from the Ministry of Education to General Directorates. International Journal of Rural Development, Environment and Health Research, vol. 5, no. 3. June 2021. Available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijreh.5.3.1

Boštjan Brezovnik, Istvan Hoffman & Jarosław Kostrubiec. Local Self-Government in Europe. Lex Localis [online]. 2021. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4335/978-961-7124-00-2

Bülent Bostanci & Nuri Erdem. Investigating the Satisfaction of Citizens in Municipality Services Using Fuzzy Modelling. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, vol. 69. March 2020. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2019.100754

Council of Europe. European Charter of Local Self-Government [online]. 1985. Available at: https://tinyurl.com/yfnsaah6

Emma Bell, Clémence Fourton & Nicholas Sowels. Public Services in the UK: The Ongoing Challenges of Delivery and Public Accountability. French Journal of British Studies, vol. 26, no. 2. 2021. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4000/rfcb.7803

European Commission. A Comparative Overview of Public Administration Characteristics and Performance in EU28 [online]. 2018. Available at: https://tinyurl.com/6c6rcbwt

European Commission. Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) 2022 [online]. 2023. Available at: https://tinyurl.com/mrtxj7fw

European Union. Developing a Decentralisation Index for the Committee of the Regions Division of Powers Portal [online]. 2021. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2863/841455

Geiguen Shin & Byong-Kuen Jhee. Better Service Delivery, More Satisfied Citizens? The Mediating Effects of Local Government Management Capacity in South Korea. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, vol. 8, no. 1. January 2021. P. 42-67. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.316

Helge Arends. The Dangers of Fiscal Decentralization and Public Service Delivery: A Review of Arguments. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, vol. 61. March 2020. P. 599-622. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-020-00233-7

Jaroslav Mihálik, Peter Horváth & Martin ŠVikruha. Give Me Liberty or Give Me Money: The Fiscal Decentralization and Autonomy of Regional Governance in Slovakia. European Journal of Government and Economics, vol. 8, no. 1. 2019. P. 96-109. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17979/ejge.2019.8.1.4573

Latika Chaudhary & Lakshmi Iyer. The Importance of Being Local: Administrative Decentralization and Human Development [online]. 2022. Available at: https://tinyurl.com/f9unssz2

Liang Ma. Performance Management and Citizen Satisfaction with the Government: Evidence from Chinese Municipalities. Public Administration, vol. 95, no. 1. March 2017. P. 39-59. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12275

Maria Mousmouti, Haris Meidanis & Jos Uitdehaag. Civil Enforcement in the EU: A Comparative Overview. Comparative Report. Centre for European Constitutional Law [online]. 2021. Available at: https://tinyurl.com/ykw23jwm

Martijn Schoute, Tjerk Budding & Raymond Gradus. Municipalities’ Choices of Service Delivery Modes: The Influence of Service, Political, Governance, and Financial Characteristics. International Public Management Journal, vol. 21, no. 4. 2018. P. 502-532. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2017.1297337

Michail Nerantzidis, Michail Pazarskis, George Drogalas, Stergios Galanis. Internal Auditing in the Public Sector: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, vol. 34, no. 2. 2022. P. 189-209. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-02-2020-0015

Miyeon Song & Kenneth J. Meier. Citizen Satisfaction and the Kaleidoscope of Government Performance: How Multiple Stakeholders See Government Performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 28, no. 4. 2018. P. 489-505. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy006

Miyeon Song, Seung-Ho An & Kenneth J. Meier. Quality Standards, Implementation Autonomy, and Citizen Satisfaction with Public Services: Cross-National Evidence. Public Management Review, vol. 23, no. 6. 2021. P. 906-928. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1730939

Nicola Bianchi, Michela Giorcelli & Enrica Maria Martino. The Effects of Fiscal Decentralization on Publicly Provided Services and Labor Markets. Working Paper No. 29538. National Bureau of Economic Research [online]. 2021. Available at: https://tinyurl.com/yeyf6b93

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Equal Access to Justice for Inclusive Growth: Putting People at the Centre. OECD Publishing. (2019). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1787/597f5b7f-en

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Making Decentralisation Work: A Handbook for Policy-Makers. OECD Publishing. (2019). Available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/g2g9faa7-en

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Digital Government Index: 2019 Results. OECD Public Governance Policy Papers No. 03 [online]. 2020. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1787/4de9f5bb-en

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). The OECD Digital Government Policy Framework: Six Dimensions of a Digital Government. OECD Public Governance Policy Papers No. 02 [online]. 2020. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1787/f64fed2a-en

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Health at a Glance 2021: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing. (2021). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1787/ae3016b9-en

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Serving Citizens: Measuring the Performance of Services for a Better User Experience. OECD Public Governance Policy Papers No. 52 [online]. 2022. Available at: https://tinyurl.com/yp68anfd

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Government at a Glance 2023. OECD Publishing. (2023). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1787/3d5c5d31-en

Raúl A. Ponce-Rodríguez, Charles R. Hankla, Jorge Martínez-Vázquez & Eunice Heredia-Ortiz. Rethinking the Political Economy of Decentralization: How Elections and Parties Shape the Provision of Local Public Goods. Publius. The Journal of Federalism, vol. 48, no. 4. 2018. P. 523-558. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjy003

Richard M. Walker & Rhys Andrews. Local Government Management and Performance: A Review of Evidence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 25, no. 1. January 2015. P. 101-133. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut038

Robinah Tumwebaze. Performance Management Systems and Local Government Service Delivery in Uganda: A Case of Bushenyi District [doctoral dissertation, Uganda Management Institute]. 2015. Available at: https://tinyurl.com/2a2vwp9a

Sujarwoto Sujarwoto. Why Decentralization Works and Does Not Works? A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Public Administration Studies, vol. 2, no. 1. 2017. P. 1-10. Available at: https://tinyurl.com/y5kkt3z7

V. V. Kruhlov & D. A. Tereshchenko. Public-Private Partnership as Tool for Developing Regional Labor Potential. Science Innovations, vol. 15, no. 6. 2019. P. 5-13. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15407/scine15.06.005

MÉTRICAS
VISUALIZAÇÕES DO ARTIGO: 561
VISUALIZAÇÕES DO PDF: 271