Fortalecimiento de la democracia mediante la participación significativa en el proceso legislativo en Indonesia

Universitas Padjadjaran
Phd in Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia
email: azuhdi93@gmail.com

Universitas Brawijaya
Master of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
email: sincorreo@gmail.com

Universitas Brawijaya
Master of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
email: sincorreo@gmail.com
Esta investigación examina el concepto de participación pública significativa en el proceso legislativo en Indonesia, destacando su importancia para lograr la gobernanza democrática y garantizar que la legislación refleje la voluntad del pueblo. El estudio utiliza un método de investigación jurídica normativa, analizando leyes y doctrinas relacionadas con la democracia participativa y los principios de participación pública. Los hallazgos destacan que la participación pública en Indonesia sigue limitada a los niveles consultivo e informativo, como se refleja en el proceso legislativo regulado por la Ley No 12 de 2011 y sus modificaciones. El estudio identifica lagunas en la implementación y propone adoptar principios de la democracia deliberativa y las teorías de participación pública para mejorar la inclusión y la eficacia legislativas. La investigación concluye que la participación significativa requiere mecanismos y parámetros claros para equilibrar la toma de decisiones legislativas con las aspiraciones públicas.
Agamben, G. (2008). State of exception. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/9780226009261
Amiruddin, H. (2012). Zainal Asikin, pengantar metode penelitian hukum. Rajawali Pers.
Arnstein, S. R. (2019). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 85(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2018.1559388
Budi Hardiman, F. (2009). Demokrasi deliberatif. PT Kanisius.
Carr, R. K. (1961). American democracy in theory and practice: Essentials of national, state, and local government.
Cheng, M., Edwards, D., Darcy, S., & Redfern, K. (2018). A tri-method approach to a review of adventure tourism literature: Bibliometric analysis, content analysis, and a quantitative systematic literature review. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 42(6), 997–1020. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348016640588
Firdaus. (2015). Constitutional engineering: Desain stabilitas pemerintahan demokrasi & sistem kepartaian. Yrama Widya.
Fishkin, J. (2011). Democratic innovations: Designing institutions for citizen participation (Review of the book by G. Smith, 2009). Perspectives on Politics, 9(1), 171–173. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592710003786
Government of Canada. (2018). Toolkit: Citizen participation in the legislative process. ParlAmericas.
Held, D. (2006). Models of democracy. Stanford University Press.
Irwansyah. (2020). Penelitian hukum: Pilihan metode & praktik penulisan artikel. Mirra Buana Media.
Isra, S., Ferdi, F., & Tegnan, H. (2017). Rule of law and human rights challenges in South East Asia: A case study of legal pluralism in Indonesia. Hasanuddin Law Review, 3(2), 117. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v3i2.1081
Kamto, M. (1996). Révision constitutionnelle en écriture d’une nouvelle constitution. Lex Lata, 023-024(Février/Mars), 17–20. https://shs.cairn.info/introduction-au-droit-constitutionnel--9782340040144
Kiss, G. (2014). Why should the public participate in environmental decision-making? Theoretical arguments for public participation. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, 22(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPso.7400
Kurnia, T. S. (2020). Komisi pemberantasan korupsi sebagai tata konstitusional abnormal dan implikasi yuridis putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 36/PUU-XV/2017. Jurnal Konstitusi, 17(1), 130. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1716
Lili Rasjid, & Wyasa Putra, I. B. (1993). Hukum sebagai suatu sistem. Remaja Rosda Karya.
Melone, S., & Minkoa, A. S. (1996). La réforme constitutionnelle du 18 janvier 1996 au Cameroun: Aspects juridiques et politiques. Fondation Friedrich Ebert AASP, GRAPS. Yaoundé. https://www.assnat.cm/images/La_Constitution.pdf
Mertokusumo, S. (2019). Teori hukum. Maha Karya Pustaka.
Mills, C. (2014). The philosophy of Agamben (0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315711720
Mochtar Kusumaatdmaja. (2012). Teori hukum pembangunan. Epistema Institute dan Huma.
Mochtar, Z. A. (2015). Antinomi dalam peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Hasanuddin Law Review, 1(3), 316. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v1i3.112
Muzaqqi, F. (2019). Diskursus demokrasi deliberatif di Indonesia. Airlangga University Press.
Parkinson, J., & Mansbridge, J. (2012). Deliberative systems: Deliberative democracy at the large scale. Cambridge University Press.
Rahardjo, S. (2014). Ilmu hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Sartori, G. (1994). Constitutional engineering. In Comparative constitutional engineering (pp. 197–204). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22861-4_13
Soekanto, S. (1985). Beberapa aspek sosial yuridis masyarakat. Alumni.
Suny, I. (1978). Mekanisme demokrasi Pancasila. Aksara Baru.
Taneko, S. B., & Soekanto, S. (2015). Hukum adat Indonesia. Rajawali Press. https://onesearch.id/Record/IOS3597.slims-3003
Tamasang, C. F. (2007). Community forest management entities as effective tools for local level participation under Cameroonian law: A case study of Kilum/Ijim Mountain Forest (Doctoral dissertation, University of Yaoundé II-Soa).
Wattimena, R. A. A. (2007). The inclusion of the other: Menyoroti masyarakat majemuk bersama Jürgen Habermas. Paper PSIK Universitas Paramadina.
Derechos de autor 2025 DIXI

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Every single author of the articles has to declare that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by them, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in the contract.
In this sense, the authors committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal DIXI before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, the authors committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.
At the same time, the authors have to declare that they are completely in agreement with the conditions presented in their work and that they cede all patrimonial rights. These rights involve reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.