Experiencia internacional y extranjera de control de la actividad de los tribunales (jueces)
Este artículo, con base en el análisis de opiniones científicas de los académicos, resume la experiencia extranjera de control de la actividad de los tribunales (jueces). Tras resumir la experiencia de Alemania, se afirma que el mecanismo jurídico de control sobre los jueces en este país se caracteriza no solo por la diferenciación de la distribución de las facultades de supervisión a nivel federal y regional, sino también por la participación activa de los órganos ejecutivos y legislativos. Se establece que la experiencia extranjera existente en materia de control y supervisión de la labor de los jueces es muy diversa y puede ser utilizada por los legisladores nacionales al introducir enmiendas y adiciones a la legislación vigente. La experiencia más positiva que puede utilizarse en Ucrania para mejorar el control de la actividad de los jueces incluye: 1) la necesidad de mejorar el procedimiento de selección de los jueces; 2) la ampliación del plazo de prescripción de la comisión de una infracción como motivo de responsabilidad disciplinaria, a fin de reducir el riesgo de que los jueces eviten que se produzca; 3) la introducción de nuevas formas y métodos de control en el campo pertinente; 4) la mejora de las bases organizativas y jurídicas de la participación pública en la aplicación de medidas de control y supervisión en el área objeto de estudio.
Cómo citar
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Every single author of the articles has to declare that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by them, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in the contract.
In this sense, the authors committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal DIXI before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, the authors committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.
At the same time, the authors have to declare that they are completely in agreement with the conditions presented in their work and that they cede all patrimonial rights. These rights involve reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.
Deutscher Bundestag. BASIC LAW FOR THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY. (2019). [Electronic resource]. Available at: https://www.btg-bestellservice.de/pdf/80201000.pdf/
Hamid Chalid. Dualism of judicial review in Indonesia: Problems and solutions. INDONESIA LAW REVIEW 3. 2017. Pg. 367-394.
Henry Brooke. ENGLISH JUSTICE SYSTEM. LORD SLYNN’S EUROPEAN LAW FOUNDATION. (2014). [Electronic resource]. Available at: https: //slynn-foundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/The-English-system-of-justice-Ukrainian-judiciary-seminars-Ukrainian-version.pdf
I. V. Nazarov. The judicial system of Great Britain and its reform in connection with the membership in the European Union. PROBLEMS OF LEGALITY: A COLLECTION OF SCIENTIFIC WORKS. Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University. (2011). Pg. 179-187.
M. N. Marchenko. SOURCES OF LAW. Prospekt. (2005).
N. Tuzhely. EUROPEAN EXPERIENCE (ON SPECIALIZATION AND DECENTRALIZATION OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM IN GERMANY). (2015). [Electronic resource]. Available at: https://yur-gazeta.com/publications/practice/inshe/evropeyskiy-dosvid.html
Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). CONCLUSION OF THE OSCE OFFICE FOR DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS NO. JUD-UKR/298/2017 [RJU/AT] OF 30 JUNE 2017 ON THE LAW OF UKRAINE “ON THE JUDICIARY AND THE STATUS OF JUDGES”. (2020). [Electronic resource]. Available at: https://hcj.gov.ua/sites/default/files/no_3534_en.doc
O. Pavliuk. THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION WILL APPLY TO THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EU THROUGH JUDICIAL REFORM IN POLAND. [Electronic resource]. Available at: https://hromadske.ua/posts/yevrokomisiya-zvernetsya-do-sudu-yes-z-privodu-sudovoyi-reformi- v-polshi
O. V. Kuzmenko, I. D. Pastukh, O. E. Korystin, et al. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW OF FOREIGN COUNTRIES: A COURSE OF LECTURES. Jurinkom Inter. (2014).
Stanislav V. Shevchuk. JUDICIAL LAW-MAKING: WORLD EXPERIENCE AND PROSPECTS IN UKRAINE. Referat. (2007).
V. V. Koshchinets & J. P. Shvedenko. Some aspects of qualification training of judges (from the experience of foreign countries). BULLETIN OF THE STATE JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION OF UKRAINE 4. 2012. Pg. 59-68.
Volker Wagener. HOW ARE GERMAN JUDGES SELECTED: DO THE BEST ALWAYS WIN? (2017). [Electronic resource]. Available at: https://p.dw.com/p/2hJGP/
