Demand for Social Interest Housing and Effectiveness of Incentives for Family Subsidy Policy in Bogotá from 2000 to 2012

Inclusión Social y Desarrollo
Carol Alejandra Bolívar Silva

Corporación Universitaria Republicana, Bogotá, Colombia.

Pedro Elías Galindo León

Corporación Universitaria Republicana, Bogotá, Colombia.

Introduction: The policy for Social Interest Housing (vis from its Spanish acronym) has been designed to contribute towards improvement of the quality of life of families of limited means through the provision of a cash subsidy, according to the different socioeconomic conditions. Methodology: In Bogotá, the following indicators are taken into account: coefficient of use of the housing subsidy, interest rates for financing housing in real value, uvr, mortgage credit approval indicator, variation in the index of prices of new and used housing, demand for non-vis housing and employment rate. The objective is to determine the behavior of the Demand for Social Interest Housing (demvis) and the effectiveness of the incentives of the policy. Results: This research article summarizes the results found during comparison of the conceptual, theoretical and regulatory structure of the Social Interest Housing policy through a qualitative analysis that apparently shows the effectiveness of that policy and the fulfillment of the requirements with the aim of favoring families of limited means. Conclusions: Based on the econometric model, it can be seen that the housing subsidy has little effect on the dynamism of the demand for Social Interest Housing.

Keywords: interest, policy, social, subsidy, housing.
Downloads

How to Cite

Bolívar Silva, C. A., & Galindo León, P. E. (2015). Demand for Social Interest Housing and Effectiveness of Incentives for Family Subsidy Policy in Bogotá from 2000 to 2012. Cooperativismo & Desarrollo, 23(106). https://doi.org/10.16925/co.v23i106.1123
Metrics
File downloads
1,353
Jan 1970Jul 1970Jan 1971Jul 1971Jan 1972Jul 1972Jan 1973Jul 1973Jan 1974Jul 1974Jan 1975Jul 1975Jan 1976Jul 1976Jan 1977Jul 1977Jan 1978Jul 1978Jan 1979Jul 1979Jan 1980Jul 1980Jan 1981Jul 1981Jan 1982Jul 1982Jan 1983Jul 1983Jan 1984Jul 1984Jan 1985Jul 1985Jan 1986Jul 1986Jan 1987Jul 1987Jan 1988Jul 1988Jan 1989Jul 1989Jan 1990Jul 1990Jan 1991Jul 1991Jan 1992Jul 1992Jan 1993Jul 1993Jan 1994Jul 1994Jan 1995Jul 1995Jan 1996Jul 1996Jan 1997Jul 1997Jan 1998Jul 1998Jan 1999Jul 1999Jan 2000Jul 2000Jan 2001Jul 2001Jan 2002Jul 2002Jan 2003Jul 2003Jan 2004Jul 2004Jan 2005Jul 2005Jan 2006Jul 2006Jan 2007Jul 2007Jan 2008Jul 2008Jan 2009Jul 2009Jan 2010Jul 2010Jan 2011Jul 2011Jan 2012Jul 2012Jan 2013Jul 2013Jan 2014Jul 2014Jan 2015Jul 2015Jan 2016Jul 2016Jan 2017Jul 2017Jan 2018Jul 2018Jan 2019Jul 2019Jan 2020Jul 2020Jan 2021Jul 2021Jan 2022Jul 2022Jan 2023Jul 2023Jan 2024Jul 2024Jan 2025Jul 2025Jan 20269
|
https://plu.mx/plum/a/?doi=10.16925/co.v23i106.1123