Variables demográficas y engrandecimiento marital en Monterrey
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León
email: jose_moral@hotmail.com
Introducción: el engrandecimiento marital es una tendencia a idealizar a la pareja. Se considera un rasgo funcional correlacionado con la satisfacción con la relación. Existe una escala para su evaluación creada en Canadá (18 ítems) y adaptada en México (14 ítems), pero no está baremada.
Objetivos: 1) describir la distribución de la Escala de Engrandecimiento Marital en su formato original de 18 ítems dicotomizados (EEM) y en su versión de 14 ítems ordinales (EEM14), a fin de comprobar cuál se adapta mejor a un concepto de rasgo funcional; y 2) estudiar la relación de la EEM y la EEM14 con variables sociodemográficas y de religiosidad (convicción y práctica), a fin de comprobar la sustantividad de estos correlatos al controlar el efecto de la satisfacción con la relación.
Metodología: se aplicó la eem, la Escala de Valoración de la Relación (RAS) y un cuestionario de datos sociodemográficos a 431 mujeres y 376 hombres casados o en unión libre de Monterrey, México. Se usó un muestreo probabilístico de rutas aleatorias.
Resultados: la EEM mostró desviación de la normalidad con asimetría positiva y perfil aplanado. La EEM14 mostró ligera desviación de la normalidad con ligera asimetría negativa y perfil mesocúrtico. La EEM y la EEM14 fueron independientes o presentaron asociaciones bajas con las variables sociodemográficas y de religiosidad. Solo las correlaciones con religiosidad fueron significativas y no triviales tras parcializar el efecto de la satisfacción con la relación (RAS).
Conclusiones: la distribución de la eem14 es más congruente con el concepto de rasgo funcional que pretende medir y no requiere baremos diferenciales por variables sociodemográficas.
Ahmadi, K., Azad-Marzabadi, E. y Nabipoor, A. S. M. (2008). The influence of religiosity on marital satisfaction. Journal of Social Sciences, 4, 103-110. doi: 10.3844/jssp.2008.103.110
American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57, 1060-1073. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.57.12.1060
Bodenmann, G., Ledermann, T. y Bradbury, T. N. (2007). Stress, sex, and satisfaction in marriage. Personal Relationships, 14, 551-569. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00171.x
Boyes, A. D. y Fletcher, G. J. O. (2007). Metaperceptions of bias in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 286-306. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.2.286
Britt, S., Grable, J. E., Goff, B. S. N. y White, M. (2008). The influence of perceived spending behaviors on relationship satisfaction. Financial Counseling and Planning, 19(1), 31-43.
Carlson, R. G., Barden, S. M., Daire, A. P. y Greene, J. (2014). Influence of relationship education on relationship satisfaction for low-income couples. Journal of Counseling & Development, 92, 418-427. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6676.2014.00168.x
Cohen, R. J., Swerdlik, M. y Sturman, E. D. (2012). Psychological testing and assessment: An introduction to tests and measurement (8.a ed.). Nueva York: McGraw-Hill.
Dellner, D. K. (2008). Pornography use, relationship functioning and sexual satisfaction: The mediating role of differentiation in committed relationships (Tesis doctoral). Recuperado de la base de datos de ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (umi N.o 3335233).
Díaz-Loving, R. y Rivera-Aragón, S. (2010) (Eds.). Antología psicosocial de la pareja. Ciudad de México: UNAM y Editorial Miguel Ángel Porrúa.
Edmonds, V. H. (1967). Marital conventionalization: Definition and measurement. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 29, 681-688. doi: 10.2307/349220
Ellis, P. D. (2010). The essential guide to effect size. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Fanni-Asl, A., Narimani, M., Rajabi, S. y Siahpoosh, H. (2009). The study of religious behavior and faith in relation with student’s marital satisfaction. Research Journal of Biological Science, 4(1), 42-47.
Fischer, R. y Milfont, T. L. (2010). Standardization in psychological research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 88-96.
Forkmana, J. y Verrill, S. (2008). The distribution of McKay’s approximation for the coefficient of variation. Statistics and Probability Letters, 78, 10-14. doi: 10.1016/j.spl.2007.04.018
Fowers, B. J. y Applegate, B. (1996). Marital satisfaction and conventionalization examined dyadically. Current Psychology, 15, 197-214. doi: 10.1007/BF02686877
Gagné, F. y Lydon, J. (2004). Bias and accuracy in close relationships: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 322-338. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_1
Glenwright, B. J. y Fowler, D. M. (2013). Implications of egalitarianism and religiosity on relationship satisfaction. Interpersona, 7, 215-226. doi:10.5964/ijpr.v7i2.137
Goddard, H. W., Marshall, J. P., Olson, J. R. y Dennis, S. A. (2012). Character strengths and religiosity as predictors of marital satisfaction in a sample of highly religious and divorce-prone couples. Journal of Couple and Relationship Therapy: Innovations in Clinical and Educational Interventions, 11(1), 2-15. doi: 10.1080/15332691.2011.613308
Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 93-98. doi: 10.2307/352430
Hirschberger, G., Srivastava, S., Marsh, P., Cowan, C. y Cowan, P. (2009). Attachment, marital satisfaction, and divorce during the first fifteen years of parenthood. Personal Relationships, 16, 401-420. doi:
1111/j.1475-6811.2009.01230.x
Huang, Y., Kotov, R., De Girolamo, G., Preti, A., Angermeyer, M., Benjet, C., ..., Kessler, R. C. (2009). dsm-iv personality disorders in the who World Mental Health Surveys. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 195, 46-53. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.108.058552
Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática (2011a). Panorama sociodemográfico de Nuevo León. Ciudad de México: INEGI.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (2011b). Panorama de las religiones en México 2010. Ciudad de México: INEGI y Secretaría de Gobernación.
Jackson, J. B., Miller, R. B., Oka, M. y Henry, R. G. (2014). Gender differences in marital satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(1), 105-129. doi:10.1111/jomf.12077
Jose, O. y Alfons, V. (2007). Do demographics affect marital satisfaction? Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 33, 73-85. doi:10.1080/00926230600998573
Margelisch, K., Schneewind, K. A., Violette, J. y Perrig-Chiello, P. (2015). Marital stability, satisfaction and well-being in old age: variability and continuity in long-term continuously married older persons. Aging and Mental Health, 10, 1-10. doi:10.1080/13607863.2015.1102197
Moral, J. (2007). Control de la deseabilidad social ante la evaluación del ajuste diádico y la satisfacción marital. Psicología y Ciencia Social, 9(2), 5-12.
Moral, J. (2008a). Predicción del ajuste diádico en una muestra nuevoleonesa. Revista Interamericana de Psicología, 42(2), 1-10.
Moral, J. (2008b). Validación de la Escala de Valoración de la Relación en población mexicana. Revista Electrónica de Metodología Aplicada, 13(1), 1-12. Recuperado de http://www.psico.uniovi.es/REMA/v13n1/vol13n1a1.pdf
Moral, J. (2015). Diferencias en satisfacción con la relación entre variables demográficas y religiosidad. Revista Salud & Sociedad, 6(1), 122-137.
Moral, J. (s. f. b). Consistencia interna y validez estructural y convergente de la Escala de Engrandecimiento Marital en una muestra probabilística de Monterrey, México. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación Psicológica, 42.
Moral, J. (s. f. b). Invarianza factorial de la Escala de Engrandecimiento Marital por sexo. Informes Psicológicos, 16(2).
Olsson, U., Drasgow, F. y Dorans, N. J. (1982).The polyserial correlation coefficient. Psychometrika, 47, 337-347. doi:10.1007/BF02294164
O’Rourke, N. (2001). Development and validation of a couples measure of biased responding: The Marital Aggrandizement Scale (Tesis doctoral, University of Ottawa). Recuperado de http://www.ruor.uottawa.ca/bitstream/10393/9347/1/NQ66177.PDF
O’Rourke, N. (2002). Predictors of change in marital aggrandizement among older adult. Journal of the Aging Family System, 1, 75-85.
O’Rourke, N. y Cappeliez, P. (2001). Marital satisfaction and marital aggrandizement among older adults: Analysis of gender invariance. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 66-79.
O’Rourke, N. y Cappeliez, P. (2002). Development and validation of a couples measure of biased responding: The Marital Aggrandizement Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 78, 301-320. doi: 10.1207/
S15327752JPA7802_06
O’Rourke, N. y Cappeliez, P. (2003a). Intra-couple variability in marital aggrandizement: Idealization and satisfaction within enduring relationships. Current Research in Social Psychology, 8(15), 206-225.
O’Rourke, N. y Cappeliez, P. (2003b). Validation d’une mesure de réponses biaisées à propos de la relation conjugale: L’Échelle d’embellissement conjugal. Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 35, 45-49. doi: 10.1037/h0087185
O’Rourke, N., Claxton, A., Kupferschmidt, A. L., Smith, J. Z. y Beattie, B. L. (2011). Marital idealization as an enduring buffer to distress among spouses of persons with Alzheimer disease. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28(1), 117-133. doi: 10.1177/0265407510386135
O’Rourke, N., Gomes, Y. y Davidov, E. (2012). Marital idealization, caregiver burden, and life satisfaction among spouses of persons with Alzheimer disease. Gerontology and Geriatrics, 29, 91-110.
O’Rourke, N., Haverkamp, B. E., Rae, S., Toukko, H., Hayden, S. y Beattie, B. (1996). Response biases as a confound to expressed burden among spousal caregivers of suspected dementia patients. Psychology and Aging, 11, 377-380. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.11.2.377
O’Rourke, N., Polchenko, N., Bachner, Y. G. y Carmel, S. (2012). Translation and validation of a Hebrew language version of the Marital Aggrandizement Scale. Ponencia presentada en The Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Orlando, Florida, Estados Unidos, agosto de 2012. Recuperado de http://www.researchgate.net/publication/252931460
O’Rourke, N. y Tuokko, H. (2000). The psychological and physical cost of caregiving: The Canadian Study of Health and Aging. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 19, 389-404. doi: 10.1177/073346480001900402
O’Rourke, N. y Wenaus, C. A. (2010). Marital aggrandizement as a mediator of burden among spouses of suspected dementia patients. Canadian Journal on Aging, 17, 384-400. doi: 10.1017/S0714980800012666
Öztuna, D., Elhan, A. H. y Tüccar, E. (2006). Investigation of four different normality tests in terms of type 1 error rate and power under different distributions. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 36(3), 171-176.
Paulhus, D. L. (1998). Manual for balanced inventory of desirable responding: Version 7 (bidr-7). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.
Razali, N. M. y Yap, B. W. (2011). Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors, and Anderson-Darling test. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics, 2(1) 21-33.
Rochon, J., Gondan, M. y Kieser, M. (2012). To test or not to test: Preliminary assessment of normality when comparing two independent samples. bmc Medical Research Methodology, 12, 81. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-81
Rushton, P. (2012). Race, evolution, and behavior: A life history perspective. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Sampieri, R., Fernández, C. y Baptista, P. (2010). Metodología de la investigación. Ciudad de México: McGraw-Hill.
Sánchez-Aragón, R. (2006). Pasión romántica: más allá de la intuición, una ciencia del amor. Ciudad de México: Miguel Ángel Porrúa.
Sheskin, D. J. (2011). Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedure (5.a ed.). Boca Ratón: CRC Press.
Singleton, A. (2014). Religion, culture and society: A global approach. Los Angeles: Sage.
Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15-28. doi: 10.2307/350547
Swami, V., Stieger, S., Haubner, T., Voracek, M. y Furnham, A. (2009). Evaluating the physical attractiveness of oneself and one’s romantic partner: Individual and relationship correlates of the love-is-blind bias.
Journal of Individual Differences, 30(1), 35-43. doi: 10.1177/0265407510385492
Ubillos, S., Zubieta, E., Páez, D., Deschamps, J. C., Ezeiza, A. y Vera, A. (2001). Amor, cultura y sexo. Revista Electrónica de Motivación y Emoción, 4, 8-9.
Verrill, S. (2003). Confidence bounds for normal and lognormal distribution coefficients of variation. Madison: United States Department of Agriculture. Recuperado de http://www1.fpl.fs.fed.us/fplrp609.pdf
Wendorf, C. A., Lucas, T., Imamoglu, E. O., Weisfeld, C. C. y Weisfeld, G. E. (2011). Marital satisfaction across three cultures: Does the number of children have an impact after accounting for other marital demographics? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(3), 340-354. doi: 10.1177/0022022110362637
Wheeler, L. A., Updegraff, K. A. y Thayer, S. M. (2010). Conflict resolution in Mexican-origin couples: Culture, gender, and marital quality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 72, 991-1005. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00744.x
As the author of the article, I declare that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by me, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in this contract.
In this sense, I am committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal Pensando Psicología before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, I am committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.
At the same time, as the author or co-author, I declare that I am completely in agreement with the conditions presented in this work and that I cede all patrimonial rights, in other words, regarding reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.
