Artículos de investigación

Análise bibliométrica da produção científica internacional em biomarcadores salivares no período 2004-2018

v. 16 n. 2 (2020)
Publicado: 2020-12-31
Rolando Pablo Alejandro Juárez

Introdução: a saliva protege a integridade dos tecidos orais, mas também oferece evidências de doenças locais e sistêmicas. Bibliometria em estudos relacionados à odontologia é incomum na literatura. Nessa perspectiva, o objetivo deste estudo foi mapear o cenário científico relacionado à pesquisa de biomarcadores salivares em todo o mundo entre 2004 e 2018.

Métodos: Este estudo adotou um método bibliométrico. Foi realizada pesquisa documental, observacional, descritiva e retrospectiva, com descrição quantitativa dos dados. Dentistry & Oral Sciences Source foi selecionada como um banco de dados bibliométrico on-line para pesquisar e recuperar documentos. Todos os dados apresentados neste estudo foram analisados utilizando os seguintes programas de software: VOSviewer, Publish or Perish, Mendeley Desktop e SPSS versão 19 para Windows. Métodos estatísticos descritivos e inferenciais foram utilizados.

Resultados: 218 documentos foram registrados. As médias e desvio padrão das publicações entre 2004-2011 (4,67 ± 1,52) e 2012-2018 (24,67 ± 2,47) apresentaram diferenças significativas (p = 0,001). Doença periodontal (37%) e câncer de boca (20%) foram os assuntos diagnósticos mais estudados. Wong DT (Universidade da Califórnia, Los Angeles, EUA) foi o autor com mais artigos (5,96%).

Conclusão: durante o período do estudo, aumentou a pesquisa internacional sobre biomarcadores salivares, indicando a importância dos componentes salivares para novas abordagens de prognóstico, diagnóstico e monitoramento de pacientes com doenças bucais e sistêmicas.

Palavras-chave: Array, Array, Array, Array

Como Citar

Análise bibliométrica da produção científica internacional em biomarcadores salivares no período 2004-2018. (2020). Revista Nacional de Odontología, 16(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.16925/2357-4607.2020.02.08

Dawes C, Pedersen AM, Villa A, Ekström J, Proctor GB, Vissink A, et al. The functions of hu-man saliva: A review sponsored by the World Workshop on Oral Medicine VI. Arch Oral Biol. 2015;60(6):863-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2015.03.004

Castagnola M, Scarano E, Passali GC, Messana I, Cabras T, Iavarone F, et al. Salivary bio-markers and proteomics: future diagnostic and clinical utilities. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2017;37(2):94-101. DOI: 10.14639/0392-100X-1598

Yoshizawa JM, Schafer CA, Schafer JJ, Farrell JJ, Paster BJ, Wong DT. Salivary biomarkers: toward future clinical and diagnostic utilities. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013;26(4):781-91. DOI: 10.1128/CMR.00021-13

Spielmann N, Wong DT. Saliva: diagnostics and therapeutic perspectives. Oral Dis. 2011;17(4):345-54. DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2010.01773.x.

Javaid MA, Ahmed AS, Durand R, Tran SD. Saliva as a diagnostic tool for oral and systemic diseases. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2016;6(1):66-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2015.08.006.

Shah S. Salivaomics: The current scenario. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2018;22(3):375–381. DOI: 10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_171_18

Pu QH, Lyu QJ, Su HY. Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications in transplantation jour-nals from Mainland China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan between 2006 and 2015. BMJ Open. 2016;6(8):e011623. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011623

Nasli-Esfahani E, Farzadfar F, Kouhnavard M, Ghodssi-Ghassemabadi R, Khajavi A, Peimani M, et al. Iran diabetes research roadmap (IDRR) study: a preliminary study on diabetes research in the world and Iran. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2017;16:9. DOI: 10.1186/s40200-017-0291-9

Juárez RP, Barrere RM. Estudio Bibliométrico de la Producción Científica Argentina en Cáncer a través de las Bases de Datos Medline y Lilacs. Rev Salud Pública (Córdoba). 2017; 21(2):31-42. DOI: 10.31052/1853.1180

Tarazona B, Vidal IA, Alonso AA. Bibliometric analysis of the scientific production in implanto-logy (2009-2013). Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(7):864-870. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12891

Jaimes-Monroy G, Valderrama-Salgado AI, Prieto-Cárdenas ES, Rincón-Bermúdez CM. Scientific production on dental caries 2014–2018: a bibliometric study in Web of Science. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioq. 2019; 31(1-2): 77-90. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfo.v31n1-2a7

Tarazona-Alvarez B, Lucas-Dominguez R, Paredes-Gallardo V, Alonso-Arroyo A, Vidal-Infer A. A bibliometric analysis of scientific production in the field of lingual orthodontics. Head Face Med. 2019;15(1):23. DOI: 10.1186/s13005-019-0207-7

Zhang W, Yuan H. A Bibliometric Analysis of Energy Performance Contracting Research from 2008 to 2018. Sustainability. 2019;11(13):3548. DOI: 10.3390/su11133548

Wang Y, Wang Q, Zhu R, Yang C, Chen Z, Bai Y, et al. Trends of spinal tuberculosis research (1994–2015): a bibliometric study. Medicine. 2016;95(38):e4923. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004923

Song J, Zhang H, Dong H. A review of emerging trends in global PPP research, analysis and visualization. Scienomtrics. 2016;107(3):1111-1147. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-016-1918-1

Moodley J, Singh V, Kagina BM, Abdullahi L, Hussey GD. A bibliometric analysis of can-cer research in South Africa: study protocol. BMJ Open. 2015;5(2):e006913. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006913

Sweileh WM. Bibliometric analysis of peer-reviewed literature in transgender health (1900 - 2017). BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2018;18(1):16. DOI: 10.1186/s12914-018-0155-5

Dawes C, Wong DTW. Role of Saliva and Salivary Diagnostics in the Advancement of Oral Health. J Dent Res. 2019;98(2):133-141. DOI: 10.1177/0022034518816961

Price, JD de Solla. Diseases of science, en Science Since Babylon, ed. ampliada, New Haven y London: Yale University Press;1975. p. 161-195.

Pena-Cristóbal M, Diniz-Freitas M, Monteiro L, Diz Dios P, Warnakulasuriya S. The 100 most cited articles on oral cancer. J Oral Pathol Med. 2018;47(4):333-344. DOI: 10.1111/jop.12686

Foy JP, Bertolus C, Goudot P, Deneuve S, Blanc E, Lasset C, et al. Bibliometric analysis of a century of research on oral erythroplakia and leukoplakia. J Oral Pathol Med. 2018;47(4):388-395. DOI: 10.1111/jop.12683

Ai J, Smith B, Wong DT. Saliva Ontology: An ontology-based framework for a Salivaomics Knowledge Base. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:302. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-302

Kramer PF, Onetto J, Flores MT, Borges TS, Feldens CA. Traumatic Dental Injuries in the pri-mary dentition: a 15-year bibliometric analysis of Dental Traumatology. Dent Traumatol. 2016;32(5):341-346. DOI: 10.1111/edt.12262

Scimago Journal & Country Rank. Country Ranking. [Internet]. España: Scimago Lab; 2020 [consultado 13 de enero 2020]. Accesible en: http://www.scimagojr.com

Red de Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología. Iberoamericana e Interamericana. [Internet]. Indicadores comparativos bibliométricos. Buenos Aires: RICYT; 2020 [consultado 13 de enero 2020]. Accesible en: http://www.ricyt.org /2010/09/comparativos/

Shaw IF. Research networking and collaboration: a case study. Qual Inq. 2018;25(9-10): 1128-1136. DOI: 10.1177/1077800418809144

Lotka AJ. The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. J Wash Acad Sci. 1926;16(12):317-323.

Baghaei Lakeh A, Ghaffarzadegan N. Global Trends and Regional Variations in Studies of HIV/AIDS. Sci Rep. 2017;7:4170. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-04527-6

Helgesson, G., Eriksson, S. Responsibility for scientific misconduct in collaborative papers. Med Health Care and Philos. 2018;21(3):423-430. DOI:10.1007/s11019-017-9817-7

Gazni A, Didegah F. Investigating different types of research collaboration and citation im-pact: A case study of harvard university publications. Scientometrics. 2011;87(2):251-265. DOI:10.1007/s11192-011-0343-8

Dhar V. Evidence-based dentistry: An overview. Contemp Clin Dent. 2016;7(3):293-4. DOI: 10.4103/0976-237X.188539

Irving SY, Curley MA. Challenges to conducting multicenter clinical research: ten points to consider. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2008;19:164-9. DOI: 10.1097/01.AACN.0000318119.67061.0f

Sprague S, Matta JM, Bhandari M. Multicenter Collaboration in Observational Research: Improving Generalizability and Efficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91 (Suppl 3):80-6. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01623

Jayaratne YS, Zwahlen RA. The evolution of dental journals from 2003 to 2012: a bibliometric analysis. PLoS One. 2015;17:e0119503. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119503

Kanavakis G, Dombroski MM, Malouf DP, Athanasiou AE. Demographic characteristics of sys-tematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials in orthodontic journals with impact factor. Eur J Orthod. 2016;38(1):57-65. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjv012

Knowledge, networks and nations: Global scientific collaboration in the 21st century. [Internet]. London: The Royal Society;2011 [consultado 19 de enero 2020]. Accesible en: https://royalsociety.org /topics-policy/projects/knowledge-networks-nations/report/

Wang X, Kaczor-Urbanowicz KE, Wong DT. Salivary biomarkers in cancer detection. Med Oncol. 2017;34(1):7. DOI: 10.1007/s12032-016-0863-4

Guerra ENS, Acevedo AC, Leite AF, Gozal D, Chardin H, De Luca Canto, G. Diagnostic capability of salivary biomarkers in the assessment of head and neck cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Oncol. 2015; 51(9): 805–818. DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2015.06.010

Kaur J, Jacobs R, Huang Y, Salvo N, Politis C. Salivary biomarkers for oral cancer and pre-cancer screening: a review. Clin. Oral Investig. 2018;22(2):633–640. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-018-2337-x

Ghallab NA. Diagnostic potential and future directions of biomarkers in gingival crevicu-lar fluid and saliva of periodontal diseases: Review of the current evidence. Arch Oral Biol. 2018;87:115–124. DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.12.022

Zinzuvadia K, Zohrehei H, Dabeshlim K, Kanasi E, Grover S, Jones JA. Salivary Biomarkers in Periodontal Diseases - a Systematic Review. Int. J. Med. Dent [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 Feb 2];22(3): 263-279. Available from: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx? direct=true&db=ddh&AN=132823701&site=ehost-live

MÉTRICAS
VISUALIZAÇÕES DO ARTIGO: 738
VISUALIZAÇÕES DO PDF: 316