Hacia una arquitectura de software híbrida clásico–cuántica derivada de la armonización de la literatura
Introducción: El presente artículo es resultado de una investigación doctoral desarrollada en 2025 sobre arquitectura de software cuántica, que aborda el potencial transformador de la computación cuántica y los desafíos de integrar sus capacidades en sistemas de software.
Problema: La ausencia de modelos arquitectónicos estandarizados para sistemas híbridos clásico–cuánticos limita la interoperabilidad, la reutilización y el diseño sistemático de soluciones de software.
Objetivo: Este estudio propone una arquitectura de referencia para apoyar el diseño y la evolución de sistemas de software híbridos clásico–cuánticos.
Metodología: La arquitectura fue derivada mediante un proceso de armonización que sintetiza enfoques académicos e industriales existentes.
Resultados: El marco propuesto define diez elementos arquitectónicos organizados en tres dimensiones: conceptual, organizacional y de calidad.
Conclusión: La arquitectura proporciona una base estructurada para el diseño y la evolución de soluciones híbridas clásico–cuánticas.
Originalidad: Este trabajo consolida conocimiento académico e industrial en un marco unificado para sistemas híbridos clásico–cuánticos.
Limitaciones: El modelo se fundamenta en un cuerpo de literatura y experiencia que requiere validación empírica futura.
Cómo citar
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Ingeniería Solidaria
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Compromiso ético y cesión de derechos
El autor debe declarar que su trabajo es original e inédito y que no se ha postulado a evaluación simultánea para su publicación por otro medio. Además, debe asegurar que no tiene impedimentos de ninguna naturaleza para la concesión de los derechos previstos en el contrato.
El autor se compromete a esperar el resultado de evaluación de la revista Ingeniería Solidaria, antes de considerar su presentación a otro medio; en caso de que la respuesta de publicación sea positiva, adicionalmente, se compromete a responder por cualquier acción de reivindicación, plagio u otra clase de reclamación que al respecto pudiera sobrevenir por parte de terceros.
Asimismo, debe declarar que, como autor o coautor, está de acuerdo por completo con los contenidos presentados en el trabajo y ceder todos los derechos patrimoniales, es decir, su reproducción, comunicación pública, distribución, divulgación, transformación, puesta a disposición y demás formas de utilización de la obra por cualquier medio o procedimiento, por el término de su protección legal y en todos los países del mundo, al Fondo Editorial de la Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, de manera gratuita y sin contraprestación presente o futura.
[1] E. Gibney, “Hello quantum world! Google publishes landmark quantum supremacy claim,” Nature, vol. 574, no. 7779, pp. 461–462, Oct. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03213-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03213-z
[2] M. Piattini, G. Peterssen, and R. Pérez-Castillo, “Quantum computing: A new software engineering golden age,” ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 12–14, Jul. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3402127.3402131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3402127.3402131
[3] M. A. Serrano, R. Pérez-Castillo, and M. Piattini, Eds., Quantum Software Engineering. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05324-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05324-5
[4] C. E. Orozco and C. J. Pardo Calvache, “Tendencias emergentes y desafíos de las arquitecturas de software en la computación cuántica: Una revisión sistemática de la literatura,” Revista Científica, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 87–111, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.14483/23448350.22793. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14483/23448350.22793
[5] J. M. Murillo et al., “Quantum software engineering: Roadmap and challenges ahead,” ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, vol. 34, no. 5, Art. no. 154, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3712002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3712002
[6] M. Piattini and J. M. Murillo, “Quantum software engineering landscape and challenges,” in Quantum Software Engineering, M. A. Serrano, R. Pérez-Castillo, and M. Piattini, Eds. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2022, pp. 25–38, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05324-5_2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05324-5_2
[7] A. A. Khan et al., “Software architecture for quantum computing systems: A systematic review,” arXiv, Art. no. 2202.05505, Feb. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2202.05505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4191449
[8] A. Ahmad, A. A. Khan, M. Waseem, M. Fahmideh, and T. Mikkonen, “Towards process centered architecting for quantum software systems,” in Proc. IEEE International Conference on Quantum Software (QSW), Barcelona, Spain, 2022, pp. 26–31, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/QSW55613.2022.00019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/QSW55613.2022.00019
[9] M. Scheerer, J. Klamroth, and O. Denninger, “Engineering reliable hybrid quantum software: An architectural-driven approach,” in Proc. 2nd International Workshop on Quantum Software Engineering and Technology (Q-SET), co-located with IEEE Quantum Week, Broomfield, CO, USA, Oct. 2021, pp. 29–37. [Online]. Available: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3008/short3.pdf
[10] L. Nallamothula, “Selection of quantum computing architecture using a decision tree approach,” in Proc. 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Sustainable Systems (ICISS), Tirunelveli, India, Dec. 2020, pp. 644–649, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICISS49785.2020.9315893. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICISS49785.2020.9315893
[11] B. Sodhi, “Quality attributes on quantum computing platforms,” arXiv, Art. no. 1803.07407, Mar. 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1803.07407.
[12] T. Yue, W. Mauerer, S. Ali, and D. Taibi, “Challenges and opportunities in quantum software architecture,” in Software Architecture: Research Roadmaps from the Community, P. Pelliccione, R. Kazman, I. Weber, and A. Liu, Eds. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023, pp. 1–23, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36847-9_1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36847-9_1
[13] M. Grossi et al., “A serverless cloud integration for quantum computing,” arXiv, Art. no. 2107.02007, Jul. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.02007.
[14] H. Yang, J. Wang, and X. Sun, “Research on quantum computing standard system architecture and roadmap,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 2433, no. 1, Art. no. 012035, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2433/1/012035. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2433/1/012035
[15] R. Pérez-Castillo and M. Piattini, “Design of classical-quantum systems with UML,” Computing, vol. 104, no. 11, pp. 2375–2403, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-022-01091-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-022-01091-4
[16] R. Ramouthar and H. Seker, “Hybrid quantum algorithms and quantum software development frameworks,” ScienceOpen Preprints, Aug. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.14293/PR2199.000298.v1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14293/PR2199.000298.v1
[17] B. Sodhi and R. Kapur, “Quantum computing platforms: Assessing the impact on quality attributes and SDLC activities,” in Proc. IEEE 18th International Conference on Software Architecture (ICSA), Stuttgart, Germany, 2021, pp. 80–91, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSA51549.2021.00016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSA51549.2021.00016
[18] B. Weder, J. Barzen, F. Leymann, M. Salm, and D. Vietz, “The quantum software lifecycle,” in Proc. 1st ACM SIGSOFT International Workshop on Architectures and Paradigms for Engineering Quantum Software (APEQS 2020), 2020, pp. 2–9, doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3412451.3428497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3412451.3428497
[19] D. Cuomo, M. Caleffi, and A. S. Cacciapuoti, “Towards a distributed quantum computing ecosystem,” IET Quantum Communication, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3–8, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-qtc.2020.0002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-qtc.2020.0002
[20] M. A. Akbar, S. Rafi, and A. A. Khan, “Classical to quantum software migration journey begins: A conceptual readiness model,” in Proc. International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, ser. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 13709, Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2022, pp. 563–573, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21388-5_42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21388-5_42
[21] V. Stirbu and T. Mikkonen, “Software architecture challenges in integrating hybrid classical-quantum systems,” in Proc. IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), vol. 2, Bellevue, WA, USA, Sep. 2023, pp. 203–204, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/QCE57702.2023.10313643. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/QCE57702.2023.10212
[22] M. S. Aktar et al., “Architecture decisions in quantum software systems: An empirical study on Stack Exchange and GitHub,” Information and Software Technology, vol. 177, Art. no. 107587, Jan. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107587
[23] F. Bühler, J. Barzen, M. Beisel, D. Georg, F. Leymann, and K. Wild, “Patterns for quantum software development,” in Proc. 15th International Conference on Pervasive Patterns and Applications (PATTERNS 2023), Barcelona, Spain, Jun. 2023, pp. 30–39, ISBN 978-1-68558-049-0. [Online]. Available: https://www.iaas.uni-stuttgart.de/publications/Buehler2023_PatternsQuantumSE.pdf
[24] IBM Quantum, “Introduction to Qiskit,” IBM Quantum Platform. [Online]. Available: https://quantum.cloud.ibm.com/docs/en/guides. [Accessed: Apr. 13, 2026].
[25] S. S. Kadam, A. C. Adamuthe, and A. B. Patil, “CNN model for image classification on MNIST and Fashion-MNIST datasets,” Journal of Scientific Research, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 374–384, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.37398/jsr.2020.640251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37398/JSR.2020.640251
[26] TensorFlow, “TensorFlow Quantum: A library for hybrid quantum-classical machine learning,” Google, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.tensorflow.org/quantum. [Accessed: Apr. 13, 2026].
[27] Microsoft, “What is hybrid quantum computing?,” Microsoft Learn. [Online]. Available: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/quantum/hybrid-computing-overview. [Accessed: Apr. 13, 2026].
[28] Microsoft, “How Microsoft and Quantinuum achieved reliable quantum computing,” Microsoft Azure Blog, Apr. 3, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/quantum/2024/04/03/how-microsoft-and-quantinuum-achieved-reliable-quantum-computing. [Accessed: Apr. 13, 2026].
[29] Microsoft, “Azure Quantum unlocks the next generation of hybrid quantum computing,” Microsoft Quantum Blog. [Online]. Available: https://quantum.microsoft.com/en-us/insights/blogs/qir/azure-quantum-unlocks-the-next-generation-of-hybrid-quantum-computing. [Accessed: Apr. 13, 2026].
[30] Google, “A new hybrid platform for quantum simulation of magnetism,” Google Research Blog, Apr. 21, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://research.google/blog/a-new-hybrid-platform-for-quantum-simulation-of-magnetism. [Accessed: Apr. 13, 2026].
[31] A. D. Barker, D. E. Bernholdt, and A. S. Bland, “High-performance computing facility operational assessment 2015: Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA, Tech. Rep. ORNL/SPR-2016/110, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1324094
[32] D. Krause, “JUWELS: Modular tier-0/1 supercomputer at the Jülich Supercomputing Centre,” Journal of Large-Scale Research Facilities, vol. 5, Art. no. A135, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.17815/jlsrf-5-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17815/jlsrf-5-171
[33] J. Dongarra et al., “The international exascale software project roadmap,” International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 3–60, Feb. 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094342010391989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094342010391989
[34] I. Iglesias Álvarez, “MareNostrum 5 conquista los 314.000 billones de cálculos por segundo,” Computerworld España, Dec. 21, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.computerworld.es/article/2100534/marenostrum-5-conquista-los-314-000-billones-de-calculos-por-segundo.html. [Accessed: Apr. 13, 2026].
[35] M. Sato, Y. Kodama, M. Tsuji, and T. Odajima, “Co-design and system for the supercomputer ‘Fugaku’,” IEEE Micro, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 26–34, Mar.–Apr. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/MM.2021.3136882. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MM.2021.3136882
[36] H. Cervantes, P. Velasco-Elizondo, and L. Castro, Arquitectura de Software: Conceptos y Ciclo de Desarrollo. Mexico City, Mexico: Cengage Learning, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.com/books/about/Arquitectura_de_software.html?id=2Za7vQEACAAJ
[37] C. Pardo, F. J. Pino, F. García, M. Piattini, and M. T. Baldassarre, “A process for driving the harmonization of models,” in Proc. 11th International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement (PROFES 2010)—Short Papers, Doctoral Symposium, and Workshops, Limerick, Ireland, Jun. 2010, pp. 51–54, doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/1961258.1961271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1961258.1961271
[38] E. S. Palma, E. Y. Nakagawa, D. M. B. Paiva, and M. I. Cagnin, “Evolving reference architecture description: Guidelines based on ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010,” arXiv, Art. no. 2209.14714, Sep. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2209.14714.
[39] M. A. Sánchez Palmero, N. Silega Martínez, and O. Y. Rojas Grass, “Revisión de elementos conceptuales para la representación de las arquitecturas de referencia de software,” Revista Cubana de Ciencias Informáticas, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 143–157, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3783/378360617011/html/
[40] L. Bass, P. Clements, and R. Kazman, Software Architecture in Practice, 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Addison-Wesley, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://www.informit.com/store/software-architecture-in-practice-9780321815736
[41] S. Angelov, P. Grefen, and D. Greefhorst, “A framework for analysis and design of software reference architectures,” Information and Software Technology, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 417–431, Apr. 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2011.11.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2011.11.009
[42] A. Josey, TOGAF® Version 9.1: A Pocket Guide. Zaltbommel, The Netherlands: Van Haren Publishing and The Open Group, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://publications.opengroup.org/g117
[43] F. J. Pino, M. T. Baldassarre, M. Piattini, and G. Visaggio, “Harmonizing maturity levels from CMMI-DEV and ISO/IEC 15504,” Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 279–296, Jun. 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/spip.437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/spip.437
[44] C. Pardo, F. García, M. Piattini, F. J. Pino, S. Lemus, and M. T. Baldassarre, “Integrating multiple models for definition of IT governance model for banking ITGSM,” International Business Management, vol. 10, no. 19, pp. 4644–4652, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.36478/ibm.2016.4644.4652.
[45] ISO/IEC/IEEE, ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2022, Systems and Software Engineering—Architecture Description. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization, Nov. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.iso.org/standard/74393.html
[46] F. Amaro and L. Domingues, “PMBOK 6th meets 7th: How to link both guides in order to support project tailoring?,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 219, pp. 1877–1884, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.486
[47] M. Geiger, S. Harrer, J. Lenhard, and G. Wirtz, “BPMN 2.0: The state of support and implementation,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 80, pp. 250–262, Mar. 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.01.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.01.006
[48] J. A. Zachman, “A framework for information systems architecture,” IBM Systems Journal, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 276–292, 1987, doi: https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.263.0276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.263.0276
[49] H. Jonkers, E. Proper, and M. Turner, “TOGAF and ArchiMate: A future together,” The Open Group, Reading, U.K., White Paper W192, Nov. 2009. [Online]. Available: https://publications.opengroup.org/w192
[50] J. Corbin and A. Strauss, Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153. [Online]. Available: https://methods.sagepub.com/book/mono/basics-of-qualitative-research/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153
