Análisis criminológico de la protección de la integridad territorial de Ucrania
PhD in Public Administration,Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty 6 of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, Kharkiv, Ukraine. E-mail: mail: pahninm@gmail.com
email: pahninm@gmail.com
Candidate of Law, Doctoral student of the Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, Kharkiv, Ukraine
email: nosah0410@ukr.net
PhD in Law, Professor of the Department of Law at National Aerospace University “Kharkiv Aviation Institute NAU “KhAI”, Kharkiv, Ukraine.
email: s.perepelitsa@khai.edu
Graduate student of the Department of Law at National Aerospace University “Kharkiv Aviation Institute NAU “KhAI”, Kharkiv, Ukraine.
email: d.topal@khai.edu
El Estado siempre es único en sus actividades y su protección, y para que cada Estado sea reconocido, siempre se debe respetar su integridad; bajo ninguna circunstancia se debe alterar la integridad territorial de un Estado. Para tal efecto, se convierte en responsabilidad del Estado velar por que quienes delictivamente afecten la integridad territorial sean debidamente sancionados. Incluso con este principio establecido, la integridad territorial del Estado siempre se ve amenazada, lo cual afecta la esencia real del Estado que es la protección de la soberanía estatal. Este artículo señala que la integridad territorial de todo Estado debe ser siempre respetada independientemente de las circunstancias, y quienes irrespeten esto deben ser penalmente responsables. En esta pregunta, estará la esencia de la metodología de investigación analítica que determinará el aspecto penal de la protección de la integridad territorial de Ucrania. A partir de la metodología anterior, se puede decir que hay violaciones continuas de la integridad territorial de Ucrania a través de los diversos delitos cometidos. Por esta razón, es necesario hacer algo para preservar la integridad territorial del Estado de Ucrania.
Analytical Report of the Rozumkov Center. Identity of citizens of Ukraine: State and changes. NATIONAL SECURITY AND DEFENSE 93. 2007. Pp. 3-9.
Antonio Cassese. INTERNATIONAL LAW IN DIVIDED WORLD. Oxford University Press. (2007).
A. Aklaev. ETHNOPOLITICAL CONFLICTOLOGY. ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT. Moscow. 2005.
David L. Attanasio. The problem of State territorial obligations. THE JOURNAL OF ETHICS 24. 2020. Pp. 427-448. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-020-09335-1
Divak Divas. SEPARATISM IS A PHENOMENON OF MODERN POLITICS. Logos. 2010.
D. I. Baratashvili, A. S. Bakhov, F. I. Kozhevnikov, D. B. Levin, et al. INTERNATIONAL LAW COURSE: THE CONCEPT AND ESSENCE OF MODERN INTERNATIONAL LAW. Volume 3. Science. (1967).
Francis Fukujama. OUR POSTHUMAN FUTURE: THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE BIOTECH REVOLUTION. Picador Publisher. (2003).
Human Security Centre. HUMAN SECURITY REPORT: WAR AND PEACE IN THE 21ST CENTURY. Human Security Centre. (2005). Available at: https://cutt.ly/CZVUs0o
Jonathan Berg. The right to self-determination. PUBLIC AFFAIRS QUARTERLY 3. 1991. Pp. 211-225. Available at: https://cutt.ly/9ZVUgQw
Julius Jacobson. Notes on self-determination. NEW POLITICS: A JOURNAL OF SOCIALIST THOUGHT 4. 2014.
L. Dugi. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. THE GENERAL THEORY OF THE STATE. (Translated by: V. Krasnokutskii, B. Syromiatnikov, A. Yashchenko; Preface: L. Dugi, P. Novgorodtsev). Publishing House of the Society I. D. Sytin. (1908).
Matthew Louis Bishop, Jessica Byron-Reid, Jack Corbett, Wouter Veenendaal. Secession, territorial integrity and (non)-sovereignty: Why do some Separatist Movements in the Caribbean succeed and others fail? ETHNOPOLITICS. 2021. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2021.1975414
M. Vehesha (ed.). POLITICAL SCIENCE: A TEXTBOOK. 3rd ed. Kyiv. 2008.
N. N. Balahurova. The State is a territorial system. BULLETIN OF CHELYABINSK STATE UNIVERSITY. SERIES: LAW 90. 2007. Pp. 5-10.
Oleksandr Yu. Dakhno. State territory and territorial integrity: Structural and functional analysis of the morphology of concepts.
SCIENTIFIC AND THEORETICAL ALMANAC GRANI 7. 2018. Pp. 31-37. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15421/171891.
O. Lisnychuk. Territorial integrity in discourse of national interests of Ukraine. SCIENTIFIC NOTES OF THE I.F. KURAS INSTITUTE OF POLITICS AND ETHNIC STUDIES 44. 2009. Pp. 65-72.
O. M. Litvinov (ed.). CRIMINOLOGY. ACADEMIC COURSE. Condor Publishing House. (2018).
Patricia Carley. Self-determination: Sovereignty, territorial integrity, and the right to secession. PEACEWORKS 7. 1996. Available at: https://cutt.ly/AZVUXiG
Rainer Bauböck. A multilevel theory of democratic secession. ETHNOPOLITICS 3. 2019. Pp. 227-246. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2019.1585088
Ryan D. Griffiths. AGE OF SECESSION. Cambridge University Press. (2016). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316676479
R. V. Mamedov. State sovereignty is an object of international legal regulation. ECONOMICS AND LAW. XXI CENTURY 2. 2013.
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Declaration of State Sovereignty of Ukraine. July 16, 1990. Available at: https://cutt.ly/3ZVUMgG
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. The Constitution of Ukraine. June 28, 1996. Available at: https://cutt.ly/zZVU2sU
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. The Criminal Code of Ukraine. April 5, 2001. Available at: https://cutt.ly/xZVU3S3
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. The Decree of the President of Ukraine On the Decision of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine. “On the National Security Strategy of Ukraine”. May 6, 2015. Available at: https://cutt.ly/zZVU7d5
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. On the National Security of Ukraine Law of Ukraine № 2469-VIII. June 21, 2018. Available at: https://cutt.ly/gZVIqsd
V. Rahmaylov. Typology and genesis of separatism in the scientific literature: Statement of the problem. SOCIAL TECHNOLOGIES: TOPICAL ISSUES OF THEORY AND PRACTICE 59-60. 2013.
Derechos de autor 2022 DIXI

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Every single author of the articles has to declare that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by them, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in the contract.
In this sense, the authors committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal DIXI before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, the authors committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.
At the same time, the authors have to declare that they are completely in agreement with the conditions presented in their work and that they cede all patrimonial rights. These rights involve reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.